论文部分内容阅读
民事诉讼诈骗是近年来司法实践中出现的一种新动向。一些人利用民事诉讼中各种程序的特点,通过制造假证据、隐瞒事实、制造假债务、恶意串通等多种手法,使法院做出有利于他们的错误裁判,在给被害人造成损失的同时也妨害了司法机关正常的诉讼活动,具有较大的社会危害性。但现行刑法对诉讼欺诈没有明确的规定,法学理论界对诉讼欺诈的定义尚未明确,给司法机关对诉讼欺诈行为的定性和处罚带来较大的困难。本文从诉讼欺诈行为概念、特征、行为属性入手,对理论界存在的观点进行了分析,阐述了诉讼欺诈行为应单独设罪加以规制的观点。
Civil litigation fraud is a new trend emerged in judicial practice in recent years. Some people make use of the features of the various procedures in civil lawsuits by making fake evidence, concealing facts, falsifying debts and malicious collusion, so that the courts can make wrong referees in their favor. In the meantime, Hinder the normal judicial proceedings, has a greater social hazard. However, the existing criminal law does not have a clear definition of litigation fraud. The definition of litigation fraud in jurisprudence circles is not yet clear, which brings great difficulties to the judiciary in defining and punishing litigation fraud. This article starts from the concepts, characteristics and behaviors of litigation fraud, analyzes the existing views of the theoretical circles, and elaborates the viewpoint that litigation fraud should be regulated solely by the crime.