徐必珍和李怀君两同志研究“普遍联系”问题,已有多年。他们以往发表的有关文论,引人注目,我是每逢必读。去年,河南大学出版社推出了他们联手撰著的《普遍联系新论》,读后更是深受启发。在辩证法研究成果较比“贫困”的年份,能有《新论》这样的哲学专著问世,确属难能可贵。 可贵者之一,在作者对马克思主义哲学的执著追求。捧读《新论》,此种感觉相当强烈。本来,“普遍联系”是马克思主义哲学的一个重要问题,但在以往的哲学研究中,并不十分显眼。正是在这被人忽视的地方,作者以哲人的眼力发现了“显眼的问题”。于是,他们积年累月,孜孜以求,“青灯黄卷,苦读寒窗”。他们一反那种浮泛学风,下功夫深钻马克思主义的有关论述;以此为基,研究中外古今之往论,坦陈自己的独特见解;阐发了普遍联系的性质,及其在唯物辩证法理论体系中的重要 Xu Bianzhen and Li Huaijun have been studying “universal contact” for many years. Their previous published literary criticism, compelling, I read every time. Last year, Henan University Press launched a “new theory of universal contact” jointly written by them and was greatly inspired after reading. It is indeed commendable to have a philosophical monograph such as “New Theory” published in the dialectic research year compared with the “impoverished” year. One of the valuable, in the author’s persistent pursuit of Marxist philosophy. Read “new theory”, this feeling is quite strong. Originally, “universal contact” was an important issue of Marxist philosophy, but it was not very conspicuous in the previous philosophical studies. It is in this neglected place, the author found the “conspicuous problem” with the philosopher’s eyesight. As a result, they year after year, assiduous, “green light yellow volume, studying hard Windows.” On the contrary, they studied the relevant discourses of Marxism on the basis of their ardor of studying style and studying hard both ancient and modern past theories, frankly expressing their own unique opinions, elaborating on the nature of universal contact and its application in the theoretical system of materialist dialectics In the important