论文部分内容阅读
拙文《“世界3”理论与图书馆学理论基础》(以下简称《刘文》)针对蔡公天、李耀彬同志《试论图书馆学新的理论基础》(以下简称《试论》)一文提出了一些不同意见。发表之后,笔者又拜读了蔡、李二同志的《再论波普尔的“世界3”与图书馆学理论基础》(以下简称《再论》)一文,笔者认为此文不少观点似是而非,破坏了马克思主义哲学作为图书馆学理论基础的纯洁性与唯一性。
Zhuo Wen “” World 3 “theory and the theoretical basis of library science” (hereinafter referred to as “Liu Wen”) against Comrade Tian, Li Yaobin, “On the new theoretical basis of library science” (hereinafter referred to as “trial” Different views. After the publication, I read another article by Comrade Cai and Li Er on Revisiting Popper’s “World 3” and “Theoretical Basis of Library Science” (hereinafter referred to as “Re-discussion”). I think this article quite a bit plausible plausible, vandalism The purity and uniqueness of Marxist philosophy as the theoretical basis of library science.