贝尔纳说过:“没有一位科学家能够保证,而且他也不能真正想保证,他所下的判断永远不会被颠倒过来。他所能希望的一切只是,而我所希望的也只是,已经建立了某些事实与另一些事实间的足够确实和显著的联系,备旁人用作基础去寻找新事实和新联系,即使这位科学家先建立起来的这些联系后来被人推翻也不要紧。”(刘大椿:《科学活动论》人民出版社,1985:167)。的确,对于许多有创造性的科学成果,用通常的规则去审评,可能有这样那样的不足,或暂时不被别人所理解。但是有些成果,如果不发表,就难以备旁人去进行新的创造,也无助于发现者本人在争论中去完善、发展已有的成果。作为科学发现确认的第一个环节 Bernard said: “No scientist can guarantee, and he can not really want to guarantee that his judgment will never be reversed. All he can hope for is, and I only hope, has been established It does not matter if some of these facts are sufficiently and obviously related to others, to be used as a basis for finding new facts and new connections, even if those links first established by this scientist were to be overthrown later. ”(Liu Dachun: “Science Activities” People’s Publishing House, 1985: 167). Indeed, for many of the creative scientific findings reviewed by the usual rules, there may be such deficiencies or for the moment not being understood by others. However, if some achievements are not published, it would be difficult to prepare others for new creation or to help the discoverer himself to perfect and develop the existing achievements in the debate. As the first step in scientific discovery