论文部分内容阅读
本文旨在考察法学领域的进展。正如庞德在其著名的教科书——《法哲学导论》的引论中所说:“二千四百年来——从公元前5世纪的古希腊思想家提出权利之正当性到底渊源于自然还是仅仅渊源于立法和惯例这样的疑问,到当代的社会哲学家追求社会控制的目标、伦理基础和永恒原理——在所有关于人类制度的研究中,法哲学一直占居着主导地位。”尽管有大量彼此近似的观察和研究,法学的主题仍然缺乏一个确定的研究方向,本文力求探明出现这种局面的原因。研究结果表明,该学科之所以停滞不前,应归咎于法律研究者未能开发库恩所谓的范式——“在一段时间内能为学术界提出典型问题及解决办法的公认的
This article aims to examine the progress in jurisprudence. As Pound argues in his famous textbook, Introduction to Legal Philosophy: ”For 2,400 years, the legitimacy of rights proposed by ancient Greek thinkers from the 5th century BC ends in nature Or just from questions such as legislation and practice, to contemporary social philosophers pursuing the goals, ethical foundations, and eternal principles of social control - jurisprudence has dominated all research on the human system. “” Despite a large number of observations and researches that are close to each other, the subject of law still lacks a definite research direction and this article seeks to identify the reasons for this situation. The results show that the reason why the discipline is stagnant should be attributed to the fact that law researchers failed to develop the so-called Kuhn’s paradigm - a recognized recognition of typical problems and solutions for academics over time