我国农村改革已经搞了八年多,成果是显而易见的,谁也不能闭眼不承认这个事实。现在的问题是,有人仍然只抱着几根僵硬的教条,来框现实的活生生的社会主义实践,凡与他们的传统观念相径庭的改革实践活动,尽管社会效果是好的,也认为它姓“资”不姓“社”,或者“性质可疑”,总是加以非议和排斥。致使一些基层干部对改革顾虑重重;农民也成天担心政策变。这个问题,不能不引起我们的高度重视。马克思的科学社会主义理论,为了它们建设社会主义提供了必须坚持辩证唯物主义和历史唯物主义的方法论原则,他历来反对也不可能给未来的社会主义发展提供一张固定 The rural reform in our country has been going on for more than eight years and the result is obvious. No one can blindly recognize this fact. The problem now is that some people still hold only a few rigid dogmas to frame realistic and lively socialist practices. Reform and practice activities that are far removed from their traditional values, even though the social effect is good, also consider it Surname “capital” is not named “Society”, or “suspicious nature”, always be criticized and excluded. As a result, some grassroots cadres have been so worried about the reform that peasants are constantly worried about policy changes. This issue can not but cause us to attach great importance. Marxist theory of scientific socialism provided the methodological principle that they must adhere to dialectical materialism and historical materialism for their construction of socialism. He has always opposed and can not provide a fix for the future development of socialism