论文部分内容阅读
本研究为Ultravist和Angiografin CT增强扫描影象质量的单音对比评定。为u组(60例)和A组(60例),分别从325名使用Uitravist和1338名作用Angiografin的病人中筛选出腹部CF平扫加增强的肝脾及腹主动肪正常者。结果造影片质量和CT值量化比较,两种造影剂的影象质量无统计学差异(P>0.05)。证明Ultravist具有更高安全性的同时也有很好的增强效果和影象质量。
This study provides a monophile contrast assessment of the enhanced image quality of Ultravist and Angiografin CT. For the u group (60 cases) and the A group (60 cases), 325 patients with Uitravist and 1338 Angiografin patients were screened for normal and enhanced abdominal CF and liver and spleen and abdominal active normal. Results Comparing the quality of the film with the CT value, there was no significant difference in the quality of the two contrast media (P> 0.05). Prove that Ultravist is more secure and has good enhancements and image quality.