论文部分内容阅读
新现实主义秉承现实主义国际关系理论的传统,基本上否认国际法之于世界政治的独立性,认为国际法只是国际权力结构的附属品,其对国家行为的制约作用也是边缘性的。在该学派中,进攻性现实主义给国际法提供的空间比之防御性现实主义要更小。在有限的空间内,新现实主义也发展出了有关国际制度和国际法的理论,其中,霸权稳定论、防御性地位论和工具性权力论是新现实主义学派有关国际制度和国际法的三种具体理论。应言之,新现实主义国际关系理论对国际法批判以及在有限范围内和有限程度上承认国际法作用形成的理论,对挖掘国际关系与国际法跨学科研究原理,具有特殊的意义。
Neo-realism upholds the tradition of the theory of realist international relations and basically deny the independence of international law in world politics. It considers international law as an adjunct to the international power structure and its restrictive effect on state behavior is also marginal. In this school, offensive realism offers less space for international law than defensive realism. In a limited space, neo-realism has also developed theories on international institutions and international law. Among them, hegemonic stability theory, defensive position theory and instrumental power theory are the three specificities of the neorealist school on international institutions and international law theory. It should be remarked that the theory of international neo-realism has a special significance for the critique of international law and its recognition of the role of international law to a limited extent and to a certain extent in the interdisciplinary research on international relations and international law.