论文部分内容阅读
1968年,美洲地质学家J.T.Wilson把板块理论称为“地质学的一次革命”,引起苏联地质学家V.V.Be1oussov的强烈反对.他以公开信的形式提出许多质疑.10年过去了,论战还在进行.这里介绍的是1979年别氏在题为“我为什么反对板块理论?”一文和美国同行纽约大学地学系A.M.C.Sengor等人的争论要点. 1.别(Beloussov):“新全球构造”或“板块构造”理论是以大洋地区的观察为背景的.海洋占地球表面的三分之二.乍看起来,似乎此理论应用到大陆上是合理的;但大洋中岩石最老年龄为150百万年,而大陆为3500百万年.因此,地壳发展的规律的推论主要应以大陆作背景,
In 1968, the American geologist JT Wilson called plate theory “a revolution in geology,” arousing strong opposition from the Soviet geologist VV Beoussov, who raised many questions in the form of an open letter. Ten years later, the controversy still exists. This article presents the main points of debate between Behço’s 1979 article entitled “Why Am I Against Plate Theory?” And AM Csengor, a member of the Department of Geosciences at New York University, a U.S. colleague, in 1979. 1. Beloussov: “New Global Constructions” or “Plate tectonics” is based on observations in the oceans, which account for two-thirds of the Earth’s surface At first glance, it seems reasonable to apply this theory to the mainland, but the oldest rock in the ocean is 150 In contrast to the mainland of 3500 million years, the corollary of the law of crustal development should mainly be based on the mainland.