报道只要挖掘得足够深,一定有故事性。案件是否典型,证据是否确凿,这两点最重要。我反对记者介入自己都感觉模糊不清的事件。我们最缺的是认真做好本职工作的人。如果你是卖油条的,希望你炸油条不用泔水油,就这么简单。记者是有职业荣誉感的,对社会是有贡献的,但并不能认为记者做的就比卖油条的要好。从长远来看,计件工资制对媒体的伤害是难以挽回的,正是这种考核制度的存在,大量记者只能庸庸碌碌,注定一辈子什么也做不成。 As long as the report digs deep enough, there must be story. Whether the case is typical or the evidence is conclusive is the most important of these two points. I oppose the involvement of journalists in events that they all feel vague and ambiguous. What we lack most is the person who conscientiously does his job. If you are selling fried dough sticks, I hope you do not have to fry the fried dough sticks, it’s that simple. Journalists have a sense of professional honor and contribute to the society, but they can not think that journalists are better than selling oil bars. In the long run, the piece-rate wage system will have an irreparable harm to the media. It is precisely this system of examination that exists for a large number of journalists who can only do mediocrity and is destined to do nothing for a lifetime.