论文部分内容阅读
《史记》所载老子世系是论争孔子和老子年代先后的重要依据。由于论争双方学者容易采取立场先行原则,致使对《史记》中老子世系的解释各执一词。出土的唐代段会墓志有一段记录老子之子李宗的事迹,反映了汉唐之间认识老子世系的视角。通过段会墓志所载老子世系的梳证可以与民国学者观点相印证,说明司马迁“信者传信,疑者传疑”原则下记载的老子世系具备真实性。
“Shi Ji” contained in the descendants of the descendants of Confucius and Lao Tzu is an important basis for the age. Due to the fact that scholars from both sides of the argument easily adopt the principle of the first principle, the interpretation of the lineage of Lao Tzu in the Records of the Historian each exert one word. Unearthed in the Tang Dynasty will be an epitaph section of the records of the son of Li Zong’s deeds, reflecting the understanding of the Han and Tang dynasties line of vision. Through the Epitaph of the Epitaph of Lao dynasty, the comb card can be contrasted with the scholars of the Republic of China, which shows the authenticity of Lao Tzu’s lineages recorded by Si Maqian, “the source of the messenger, the suspicion of the suspect.”