论文部分内容阅读
并存债务承担(债务加入)在我国现行法律的规定并不明确,在法律实务中也存在与第三人替代履行、免责的债务承担、连带保证等类似制度混淆难辨的情况。文章从并存债务的特征、变现形式入手,从概念对比和学术观念引用两个维度进行研究,认为并存债务承担后,承担人与原债务人对债务承担无限连带责任,承担人得享有原债务人对债权人的抗辩事由,第三人在原债务上的担保继续存在。
Coexistence of debt commitments (debt accession) The provisions of the current law in our country are not clear, there are also legal practice and other third-party alternative performance, exemption of debt commitments, joint guarantee and other similar system confusion difficult to distinguish the situation. The article starts from the coexistence of the characteristics of debts and realization of the debts. It studies from the two dimensions of concept comparison and academic conception, and holds that the borrower and former debtor have unlimited joint and several liability for debts, Defenses, the third party in the original debt guarantees continue to exist.