论文部分内容阅读
目的:观察二种不同给药方法在剖宫产术预防性应用抗生素中的效果。方法:对120例剖宫产术预防性应用抗生素术前给药(A组)术后给药(B组)两种方法比较。结果:A组术后平均最高体温(37.32±0.26)术后退热时间(1.43+1.26)天。均低于/短于B组(37.58±0.64)。(2.56+1.40)天。二者差异有显著性(P0.05,P0.05)。A组术后病率0例。B组术后病率1例。人均抗生素用量。A组人均6支。B组人均12支。二者比较差异有显著性(P0.001)。二者均无药物不良反应发生。结论:剖宫产预防性应用抗生素术前给药效果优于术后给药。值得临床推广。
Objective: To observe the effect of two different administration methods in prophylactic antibiotics in cesarean section. Methods: 120 cases of cesarean section prophylactic use of antibiotics preoperative administration (A group) after administration (B group) two methods comparison. Results: The average postoperative postoperative fever (37.32 ± 0.26) in group A was 1.43 + 1.26 days after operation. Were lower than / shorter than the B group (37.58 ± 0.64). (2.56 + 1.40) days. The difference was significant (P <0.05, P <0.05). A group of postoperative disease rate in 0 cases. B group postoperative morbidity in 1 case. Per capita antibiotic dosage. A group of 6 per capita. Group B, 12 per capita. The difference between the two was significant (P <0.001). Neither drug adverse reaction occurred. Conclusion: Preoperative prophylaxis with cesarean delivery of antibiotics is superior to postoperative administration. Worth clinical promotion.