前些日子,一些报纸围绕“马丁事件”作了不少文章。从学术讨论的角度看,人们倾向于这么一种意见:需要造就一种比较融洽的气氛,一种此较宽松的舆论环境。报纸本应为造就这种气氛和环境作出努力,然而很遗憾,“马丁事件”之所以成为“事件”,却与我们新闻界不无关系。违背事实作报道,是一个原因。事情是由国外的新闻机构引起的。马丁的文章《我国经济学研究的十大转变》,早在1985年11月2日就发表在《工人日报》上,《北京周报》作了转载。可是日本时事通讯社在电讯报道中,却把马丁的原文意思歪曲了。马丁在文章中只是说,马克思主义政治经济学“在不同的历史时期面对着不同的任务”,在解决我国社会主义建设中的许多经济问题时,“在《资 A few days ago, some newspapers made a lot of articles on the “Martin Incident.” From the academic discussion point of view, people tend to such an opinion: the need to create a more harmonious atmosphere, a more relaxed media environment. The newspaper should have worked to create such an atmosphere and environment. However, it is regrettable that the “incident” of the “Martin Incident” has nothing to do with our press. It is one reason to report something against the facts. Things are caused by foreign news agencies. Martin’s article “Top Ten Changes in China’s Economic Studies” was published in the Workers Daily as early as November 2, 1985, and the Beijing Weekly Newspaper was reprinted. However, the Jiji Press Agency in the telecommunications coverage, but the original meaning of Martin distorted. In his article, Martin just said that Marxist political economy “faces different tasks in different historical periods.” When solving many economic problems in the socialist construction of our country,