论文部分内容阅读
2010年5月30日,“两高三部”联合制定的两个证据规定,即《关于办理死刑案件审查判断证据若干问题的规定》和《关于办理刑事案件排除非法证据若干问题的规定》,颁布实施。两个证据规定不仅规定了非法证据及其排除规则,在《关于办理死刑案件审查判断证据若干问题的规定》中,还出现了“瑕疵证据”的概念。瑕疵证据,就是指证据的收集程序具有轻微违法性的证据。瑕疵证据是为了弥补非法证据排除规则过于严厉的不足而提出的。瑕疵证据的最大特点在于它是在收集程序上存在瑕疵的证据,它既不是完全合法的证据,也不能完全被视为非法证据。瑕疵证据在转化之前证据能力待定,这一点使它区别于必须排除的非法证据。
May 30, 2010, “two high three ” jointly developed two evidence provisions, namely “on the handling of death penalty cases to examine the evidence of a number of issues ” and “on the handling of criminal cases to exclude some of the issues of illegal evidence provisions” , Promulgated and implemented. The two evidentiary provisions not only stipulate illegal evidence and its exclusion rules, but also the concept of “flaw evidence” in the “Provisions on Several Issues Concerning the Examination and Judgment of Evidence in Handling Death Sentences”. Defective evidence refers to the evidence that the collection procedure of the evidence has a slight illegality. Defective evidence is made to make up for the undue harshness of the rule of exclusion of illegal evidence. The most striking feature of the evidence of flaw lies in the fact that it is evidence of a flaw in the collection procedure that is neither perfectly valid nor completely illegitimate. Defective evidence has to be determined before the conversion, which distinguishes it from the unlawful evidence that must be excluded.