论文部分内容阅读
目的:比较一次性包皮切割缝合器行包皮环切术与传统包皮环切术的临床疗效。方法:214例患者分成两组,缝合器组108例,应用一次性包皮切割缝合器行包皮环切术;传统手术组106例,采用传统包皮环切手术。比较两种手术方式的手术时间、术中失血量、疼痛程度、术后相关并发症、术后性功能,并进行统计分析。结果:缝合器组在手术时间、术中失血量、术中和术后疼痛及术后并发症等方面,均明显优于传统手术组,差异有统计学意。并且缝合器组术后切口愈合好,外形美观,患者满意度较高。结论:一次性包皮切割缝合器是一种可靠的包皮环切新方法,值得临床推广。
Objective: To compare the curative effect of circumcision and conventional circumcision of one-off circumcision and suturing. Methods: 214 patients were divided into two groups, stapler group 108 cases, the application of disposable foreskin cutting suture circumcision; the traditional surgery group 106 cases, the use of traditional circumcision. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, degree of pain, postoperative complications and postoperative sexual function were compared between the two surgical methods and statistical analysis was performed. Results: The suture group was significantly better than the traditional surgery group in the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative and postoperative pain and postoperative complications, the difference was statistically significant. And the incision group of the stapler group healed well, beautiful appearance, higher patient satisfaction. Conclusion: The one-off foreskin incision and suturing device is a reliable new circumcision method, worthy of clinical promotion.