就两岸“告诉乃论罪”的诉讼程序相比,大陆“被害人有证据证明的轻微刑事案件”有关规定事实上扩展了“告诉才处理”案件范围,可与台湾地区“告诉乃论罪”之范围媲美;台湾地区“告诉乃论罪”被害人或其他法定关系人可走“告诉——公诉”(为主)和自诉(为辅)两种程序,大陆“告诉才处理”案件只能走“告诉——自诉”程序;由此决定两者“告诉乃论罪”的“告诉”合法要件及“告诉”的撤回、“告诉”的可分性原则等方面各自具有自身的特点。两岸同根同源,台湾地区“告诉乃论罪”的诉讼程序对大陆具有较高的借鉴价值。 The relevant provisions of the mainland’s “minor criminal cases proved by evidence of the victim” actually extend the scope of the “cases before being dealt with” in respect of the procedures for cross-Strait “telling offenses” Tell the theory is that the crime is comparable to the scope of “;” In Taiwan “Tell the theory of sin ” Victims or other legal persons can go “tell - public prosecution” (mainly) and private prosecution (supplemented) The “tell before handling” case can only go “tell - self-prosecution” procedure; thus determine both the “tell doctrine” “tell” legal element and the “tell” withdrawal, “Tell ” principle of separability and so on each has its own characteristics. Both sides of the Taiwan Strait share the same origin with each other. Taiwan’s lawsuit procedure of “telling offenses” is of high reference value to the mainland.