案例睢县河集乡朱秀敏与柳付长因宅基地边界发生争议(双方均有宅基证),朱秀敏以柳付长侵权为由将其诉至法院。法院经现场勘验发现双方宅基证载面积均与实际不符(重叠),且四邻也和实际不符,认为该案系土地权属争议,应由人民政府处理,遂裁定驳回了朱秀敏的起诉。 In the case of disputes between Zhu Xiumin and Liu Fuchang in the border town of Shexianhe Township on the border of the house sites (both of which have house ownership certificates), Zhu Xiumin brought them to court on the grounds that Liu Fu-long infringed them. After an on-site inspection, the court found that the area of ​​homestead certificates both did not match (actually overlap) with each other and the neighborhood did not match with the actual situation. They believed that the dispute over land ownership should be handled by the people’s government and the court dismissed the prosecution of Zhu Xiomin.