论文部分内容阅读
拙文《论梅曾亮的文学思想》(本刊97年第1期)一文,从师传关系,时代背景及个人性格等方面入手,对梅曾亮(1786—1856)的文论思想做了较为详尽的考察;因限于篇幅,对其颇有特色的诗学理论未曾涉及。兹爰为短文,以补前文论之未及者。梅曾亮于诗、于文都有较为丰富的创作经验(参观《柏枧山房文集》),故其文论、诗论,命题未必都新,但因有创作为基础,于传统理论多阐发独到,体味精微,且自成系统,值得借鉴。诗与文在一些基本道理上是相通的,但二者毕竟是不同的体裁,而且古人又大都以杂文学的眼光对待文,而诗则属于纯文学,故于二者的理论,也有不同之处。梅曾亮的《与孙芝房
My essay on Mei Zengliang’s Literary Thoughts (No. 97, Issue 1, 1997) starts with the relations between teachers and students, the background of the times and the personality of the individual. This article compares Mei Zeliang’s literary theory with that of Mei Zengliang (1786-1856) Exhaustive investigation; due to space limitations, its characteristic poetics theory has not been involved. Zi 爰 for the essay to make up for the forerunner of the theory. Mei Zengliang in poetry, Yu Wen has a wealth of creative experience (visit “Pok Mi Shan Fang Collection”), so its literary theory, poetic theory, proposition may not be new, but because of creation as a foundation, in the traditional theory and more Analysis of unique, subtle taste, and self-contained system, it is worth learning. Poetry and the text are similar in some basic principles, but the two are different genres after all, and most of the ancients treated the essay in the perspective of essay. However, the poem belongs to the pure literature. Therefore, the theories of the two are different Department. Mei Zengliang "and Sun Zhi Fang