论文部分内容阅读
四如果口述历史作为探索人类记忆的一种有效途径之说能够成立,我们也就可以提出更进一步的问题:口述历史能否且作为人学和心理学的一种求知途径?即,“口述史学”是否应该包含人学和心理学研究?这问题值得进一步讨论。此前的讨论一直建立在一个普遍认同的假定基础之上:即口述历史是属于且只属于历史学,口述历史的价值唯有历史学这一维度去衡量,亦即口述历史档案只有符合历史学所要求的真实性、可信度才有存在的价值。为了鉴别或分析口述历史材料的真实性和可靠性,我们才要借助于心理学知识和技术。在这里,
4. If oral history as an effective way to explore human memory can be established, then we can ask a further question: can oral history be and serve as a way to find out about humanism and psychology? That is, History "should include human and psychological research? This issue deserves further discussion. The previous discussion has been based on the generally accepted assumption that oral history belongs to and belongs only to history, and that the value of oral history is measured only in the dimension of history, that is, oral history files are only consistent with historical studies The authenticity of the request, the credibility of the existence of the value. In order to identify or analyze the authenticity and reliability of oral historical materials, we need to rely on psychology knowledge and technology. it’s here,