睡眠障碍性呼吸评分与缺血性卒中患者血小板功能及卒中复发的相关性

来源 :国际脑血管病杂志 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:forisa1
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨应用四变量评分评估的睡眠障碍性呼吸(sleep-disordered breathing, SDB)患病可能性对急性缺血性卒中患者血小板功能及卒中复发风险的影响。方法:前瞻性纳入2020年1月至2021年1月期间威海市立医院神经内科收治的急性缺血性卒中患者。主要纳入标准:在发病24 h内入院;美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分≤3分;接受阿司匹林+氯吡格雷双联抗血小板治疗(以下简称“双抗”)。依据四变量评分将所有患者分为SDB高可能性组和低可能性组。在双抗治疗后(7±2)d使用PL-12多参数血小板功能分析仪检测血小板最大聚集率(maximum aggregation rate, MAR)。出院后进行为期6个月的随访,观察缺血性卒中复发情况。构建以患SDB高可能性为自变量、MAR为中介变量、卒中复发为因变量的中介效应模型,首先对因变量MAR和自变量SDB高可能性进行线性回归分析,然后进行因变量为缺血性卒中复发对自变量SDB高可能性和MAR的二元n logistic回归分析。n 结果:共213例患者纳入研究,患者平均年龄(62.70±10.04)岁,男性146例(68.5%),高可能性组121例(56.8%),随访期间24例(11.3%)出现卒中复发。单变量分析显示,SDB高可能性组花生四烯酸(arachidonic acid, AA)诱导的MAR(MAR-AA)以及二磷酸腺苷(adenosine diphosphate, ADP)诱导的MAR(MAR-ADP)均显著高于低可能性组(n P均<0.05);复发组MAR-AA和MAR-ADP均显著高于未复发组(n P均<0.05),且复发组患SDB高可能性的比例显著更高(n P=0.008)。二元logistic回归分析显示,高半胱氨酸(优势比1.132,95%置信区间1.048~1.223;n P=0.002)和患SDB高可能性(优势比6.351,95%置信区间1.134~35.566;n P=0.035)是双抗患者卒中复发的独立危险因素。中介效应分析显示,MAR对患SDB高可能性患者的卒中复发风险具有显著的中介效应。n 结论:SDB高可能性组MAR和卒中复发率均显著高于低可能性组,其卒中风险很可能是由血小板高反应性介导的。“,”Objective:To investigate the effect of the possibility of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) as assessed by the four-variable score on the platelet function and the risk of stroke recurrence in patients with acute ischemic stroke.Methods:Patients with acute ischemic stroke admitted to the Department of Neurology, Weihai Municipal Hospital from January 2020 to January 2021 were enrolled prospectively. Main inclusion criteria: admission within 24 h of onset; National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score ≤3; Receiving aspirin + clopidogrel dual antiplatelet therapy. All patients were divided into a high possibility group and a low possibility group of SDB according to the four-variable score. 7±2 d after dual antiplatelet therapy, PL-12 multi-parameter platelet function analyzer was used to detect the maximum aggregation rate (MAR). The patients were followed up for 6 months after discharge and the recurrence of ischemic stroke was observed. The mediating effect model was established with the high possibility of SDB as the independent variable, MAR as the intermediary variable and stroke recurrence as the dependent variable. Firstly, MAR as the dependent variable and high probability of SDB as the independent variable were analyzed by linear regression; then, a binary n logistic regression analysis was performed with ischemic stroke recurrence as the dependent variable and the high probability of SDB and MAR as independent variables.n Results:A total of 213 patients were enrolled in the study. The average age of the patients was 62.70 ± 10.04 years old. There were 146 male (68.5%) and 121 patients (56.8%) were in the high possibility group (56.8%). During the follow-up period, 24 patients (11.3%) had stroke recurrence. Univariate analysis showed that arachidonic acid (AA) induced MAR (MAR-AA) and adenosine diphosphate (ADP) induced the MAR (MAR-ADP) in the high possibility group of SDB were significantly higher than those in the low possibility group (all n P<0.05); MAR-AA and MAR-ADP in the recurrent group were significantly higher than those in the non-recurrent group (alln P<0.05), and the proportion of high possibility of SDB in the recurrent group was significantly higher (n P=0.008). Binary n logistic regression analysis showed that homocysteine (odds ratio 1.132, 95% confidence interval 1.048-1.223; n P=0.002) and having high possibility of SDB (odds ratio 6.351, 95% confidence interval 1.134-35.566; n P=0.035) were the independent risk factors for stroke recurrence in patients treated with dual antiplatelet therapy. Intermediary effect analysis showed that MAR had a significant intermediary effect on the risk of stroke recurrence in patients with high probability of SDB.n Conclusion:The MAR and stroke recurrence rates in the high possibility group of SDB were significantly higher than those in the low possibility group, and its stroke risk was probably mediated by platelet hyperreactivity.
其他文献
目的:观察黄体酮对切口痛大鼠机械缩足反射阈值(paw mechanical withdraw threshold, PMWT)、脊髓神经激肽-1受体(neurokinin-1 receptor, NK-1R)、血浆P物质表达的影响,探讨黄体酮对疼痛影响的可能机制。方法:采用随机数字表法将24只健康成年雄性Wistar大鼠分为对照组(C组)、黄体酮组(P组,术前3 h肌内注射1.5 mg/100 g)、米非司酮组(M组,术前3 h灌胃1.5 mg/100 g),每组8只。按照Brennan法制备足底切口痛模
目的:基于校正改良早期预警评分(Modified Early Warning Score, MEWS)构建术后患者院内转运分级方案,探讨其临床应用效果。方法:选取2020年10月—2020年12月山西医科大学第一医院手术室进行院内转运的患者140例,按进入手术室时间顺序分为对照组(2020年10月1日—2020年11月15日入手术室)和试验组(2020年11月16日—2020年12月31日入手术室),每组70例。对照组按照传统转运方式进行转运,试验组基于校正MEWS构建院内转运分级方案。分析比较两组患者转
目的:探讨蛋白激酶Cβ2 (protein kinase Cβ2, PKCβ2)在高糖与缺氧/复氧(hypoxia/reoxygenation, HR)诱导的心肌细胞焦亡中的作用。方法:将培养的H9c2心肌细胞按随机数字表法分为5组(每组6孔):低糖组(LG组)、低糖缺氧/复氧组(LG+HR组)、高糖组(HG组)、高糖缺氧/复氧组(HG+HR组)、高糖缺氧/复氧+PKCβ2抑制剂CGP53353 (1 μmol/L)治疗组(HG+HR+CGP组)。采用三气培养箱(5%COn 2、94%Nn
目的:观察面肌痉挛微血管减压术后应用不同剂量舒芬太尼镇痛方案对术后恶心呕吐不良反应的影响。方法:回顾性纳入行微血管减压术的面肌痉挛女性患者183例,在相同麻醉方法的基础上根据术后是否使用舒芬太尼镇痛泵及其不同剂量将患者分为舒芬太尼2 μg/kg组(A组,60例)、舒芬太尼1 μg/kg组(B组,60例)和未使用镇痛泵组(C组,63例)。主要观察指标为3组患者术后2、8、24 h恶心呕吐的发生率。次要观察指标为3组患者手术时间,麻醉时间,术后2、8、24 h的VAS疼痛评分等级。结果:A组患者术后2、8、2
目的:探讨利多卡因对胸腔镜肺叶切除术患者术中药物用量、术后恢复质量和术后慢性疼痛(postoperative chronic pain, CPSP)的影响。方法:纳入择期胸腔镜下肺叶切除术患者90例,采用随机数字表法将患者分为利多卡因组(L组)和对照组(C组),每组45例。L组麻醉诱导时给予利多卡因1.0 mg/kg,后予利多卡因1.5 mg·kgn -1·hn -1持续泵入,至手术结束拔管前停药;C组给予等容量的生理盐水。比较两组患者一般情况;记录两组患者手术时间、麻醉时间、单肺通气
目的:探讨右美托咪定(dexmedetomidine, Dex)对CPB冠状动脉旁路移植术患者术后急性肾损伤(acute kidney injury, AKI)的影响及其相关机制。方法:择期行CPB冠状动脉旁路移植术的患者80例,年龄42~76岁,体重50~85 kg,性别不限,采用随机数字表法分为对照组(C组)和右美托咪定组(D组),每组40例。麻醉诱导前,D组给予静脉注射Dex负荷剂量0.6 μg/kg,15 min后以0.5 μg·kgn -1·hn -1的速度持续静脉泵注至术后
目的:探讨血清尿酸水平与老年前循环急性缺血性卒中(acute ischemic stroke, AIS)患者血管内治疗(endovascular therapy, EVT)后有症状颅内出血(symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, sICH)及转归的相关性。方法:回顾性纳入2017年12月至2020年12月期间在北京老年医院和宣武医院接受EVT的老年(年龄≥65岁)AIS患者。sICH定义为入院72 h内复查CT显示脑实质出血且基线美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分较基线增加≥
新《政府会计准则》《政府会计制度》的颁布实施,对政府会计信息质量提出更高要求.决算报告是综合反映会计主体预算收支执行结果的文件.本文从县级行政事业单位自身的视角,总结执行新《政府会计准则》《政府会计制度》实施两年来编报部门决算工作实践,反映部门决算编报现状,剖析存在的问题,并对如何促进完善和改进部门决算提出建议,提高部门决算报告编报水平.
目的:比较超声引导下腰方肌阻滞(quadratus lumborum block, QLB)与肋缘下腹横肌平面阻滞(transverse abdominal plane block, TAPB)用于腹腔镜胃癌根治术的术后镇痛效果。方法:选择2021年1月至2021年7月择期在全身麻醉下行腹腔镜胃癌根治术的患者60例,采用随机数字表法分为两组(每组30例):肋缘下TAPB组(T组)和QLB组(Q组)。全身麻醉诱导前,两组患者分别在超声引导下行双侧肋缘下TAPB或QLB,两组每侧均注射0.375%罗哌卡因20