论文部分内容阅读
目的:探究基于共同养育理论的母乳喂养干预方案对初产妇母乳喂养情况的影响。方法:采用便利抽样法，选取2019年在北京市丰台区妇幼保健院产科门诊进行产前检查的67名初产妇及其配偶67名为研究对象，以预产期在2019年10—11月的35名初产妇及其35名配偶为对照组，预产期在2019年12月—2020年1月的32名初产妇及其32名配偶为试验组。对照组通过微信群给予母乳喂养知识宣教和答疑，试验组在对照组的基础上接受基于共同养育理论的母乳喂养干预方案。比较两组初产妇产后6周的纯母乳喂养率、简体中文版母乳喂养自我效能简式量表（BSES-SF）得分、简易共同养育关系量表（Brief CRS）得分及其配偶的中文版婴儿喂养态度量表（IIFAS）得分。结果:试验组产后6周纯母乳喂养率为87.5%（28/32），高于对照组的77.1%（27/35），差异无统计学意义（χn 2=0.432，n P>0.05）。试验组初产妇的简体中文版BSES-SF内心活动维度得分为（20.78±5.05）分、Brief CRS总分为（71.84±8.60）分、产妇配偶的中文版IIFAS总分为（63.38±7.25）分，高于对照组的（16.94±4.78）、（67.00±10.94）、（59.89±5.92）分，差异均有统计学意义（n t值分别为3.196、2.002、2.166；n P0.05) . In the experimental group, the score of inner activity dimension of the simplified Chinese version of BSES-SF was (20.78±5.05) , the total score of the Brief CRS was (71.84±8.60) and the total score of the Chinese version of IIFAS among spouses of primiparas was (63.38±7.25) , which were higher than (16.94±4.78) , (67.00±10.94) , (59.89±5.92) of the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (n t=3.196, 2.002, 2.166; n P<0.05) .n Conclusions:The breastfeeding intervention scheme based on co-parenting theory can improve the attitude of spouses of primiparas to infant feeding and co-parenting perception of primiparas, and the effect of the intervention on improving the rate of exclusive breastfeeding and self-efficacy of breastfeeding needs to be further verified.