论文部分内容阅读
一、对过去研究模式总的看法1963年6月,美国卫生、教育和福利部的一份题为“进展中的图书馆学研究”的报告,分析了从1959年到1963年间图书馆学研究活动情况,提出了图书馆学的方法论趋势。549项研究成果的分析表明,五年间研究集中于以下几个方面:19％是关于图书馆史的;29％涉及组织与管理(其中包括大量图书馆调查),而论述图书馆中自动化应用与评估的成果占到总数的18.4％。这几年的研究还包括资源;人事和培训;国际、比较和国外图书馆学;读者服务和研究方法。运用的方法论有:文献分析、调查方法和数据基本统计分析。偶而还使用建模测试法,准实验方法等,而再复杂些的方法则几乎没有。正如戈德斯坦(Goldstein)在《威尔逊图书馆通讯》中所说的那样,“在我们这个学科中,研
I. A General View of Past Research Patterns In June 1963, a report by the U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare entitled “Progressive Library Science Studies” analyzed the study of library science from 1959 to 1963 Activities, put forward the methodological trend of library science. An analysis of 549 research results shows that the five-year study focused on the following aspects: 19% relate to the history of the library, 29% involve the organization and management (which includes a large number of library surveys), and discuss the application of automation in libraries The assessed results accounted for 18.4% of the total. Research in these years also includes resources; personnel and training; international, comparative and foreign library science; reader services and research methods. The methodology used is: literature analysis, survey methods and basic statistical analysis of data. Occasionally use modeling test methods, quasi-experimental methods, and then more complex methods are almost no. As Goldstein said in the Wilson Library Newsletter, "In our discipline, research