论文部分内容阅读
目的:讨论分析微创拔牙与传统拔牙的临床效果并进行对比。方法:选择2015年9月至2016年9月于我院进行拔牙的患者152例,所有患者按照1:1的比例平均分配为两组,一组为研究组患者76例,一组为参考组患者76例。研究组患者选择微创拔牙术进行拔牙,参考组患者选择传统拔牙术进行拔牙。统计分析两组患者的拔牙情况,并将分解分析的两组数据进行组间对比。结果:根据对比结果显示,研究组患者的断根率、拔牙窝不完整率、牙跟撕裂发生率、术后肿胀发生率显著低于参考组患者,组间数据对比差异性显著,符合统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:相对于传统拔牙术而言,微创拔牙术的优势更多,治疗效果更佳,更值得临床推广与应用。
Objective: To discuss and analyze the clinical effect of minimally invasive extraction and traditional extraction. Methods: From September 2015 to September 2016, 152 patients were selected for tooth extraction in our hospital. All patients were equally divided into two groups according to the ratio of 1: 1. One group consisted of 76 patients in the study group and one group as the reference group 76 patients. The study group selected minimally invasive extraction for tooth extraction, the reference group of patients choose traditional extraction for tooth extraction. Statistical analysis of two groups of patients with tooth extraction, and decomposition analysis of two sets of data for comparison between groups. Results: According to the results of comparison, there was significant difference between the two groups in the root breaking rate, incomplete tooth socket extraction, the rate of heel laceration and postoperative swelling in the reference group, which was statistically significant in accordance with the statistics Significance (P <0.05). Conclusion: Compared with traditional extraction, the advantages of minimally invasive extraction more, the treatment effect is better, more worthy of clinical promotion and application.