一、概论就罗马法中的经验来看,物的担保之范畴可以用在很大的范围上,因为它不仅包括物权部分的法律制度:例如信托担保事实上是以担保为目的的信托;并且,对于塞尔维安诉权的范围,给付质押就不构成物权,而是一种占有的形态。在今日的法教义学中,将担保物权放人物权的领域仍然备受争议(遭到Francesco Carnelutti的批评,他仅仅从诉讼权中看到了重要的优先原因),因为它并未给予一项对物的直接管控的权利,也没有给予直接占有或处置以满足 I. Introduction As far as the experience of Roman law is concerned, the scope of the security of things can be applied to a great extent because it includes not only the legal system of the part of the property right: for example, the trust guarantee is in fact the trust for the purpose of security; Moreover, for the scope of the rights of the Serbian prosecution, pledges do not constitute property rights, but a form of possession. In today’s teaching of jurisprudence, the area of ​​deporting security interests remains controversial (Francesco Carnelutti’s criticism, he sees only an important priority from the right of action) because it did not give one The right to direct control over things is also not given direct possession or disposal to meet