论文部分内容阅读
读了刊登在广西《法治快报》8月9日的一篇法制消息,感到非常惊讶,不是因为消息本身,而是因为一个离谱的常识性错误。这篇题为《诱拍女友裸照索钱被判处4年徒刑》的消息写道:梁××诱拍女友裸照勒索,被桂林市秀峰区人民检察院以敲诈勒索罪判处有期徒刑4年。也许稍有法律常识的读者已经看出了其中的荒谬之处,审判是人民法院的职能,检察院哪来的审判权?这样的消息登在法制类报纸上,实在是太刺眼,与其宣传功能太不协调了。无独有偶。我也是从事法制报道的
It was a great surprise to read a piece of legal information published in Guangxi’s “Rule of Law Express,” August 9, not because of the news itself, but because of an outrageous common-sense mistake. The article entitled “lured his girlfriend nude claim money was sentenced to 4 years in prison,” the news wrote: Liang × × lure his girlfriend nude blackmail, Guilin Xiufeng District People’s Procuratorate extortion of imprisonment for 4 years. Perhaps a little bit of legal common sense readers have seen one of the absurdities, the trial is the function of the people’s court, prosecutors come to the jurisdiction of the jurisdiction of such news on the legal newspaper, it is too dazzling, with its promotional features too Uncoordinated. Coincidentally. I am also engaged in legal reporting