论文部分内容阅读
目的 :探讨ESWL术与输尿管治疗输尿管远端结石的疗效。方法 :通过ESWL术与输尿管镜对输尿管远端结石治疗的排石情况、治愈率、并发症发生及费用的比较研究 ,总结两种方法的优势与缺点。结果 :ESWL组病人 386例 ,术后 3个月结石排净率 77% ,并发症较少 ,输尿管镜组病人 46 0例 ,3个月内排净结石 93% ,并发症相对较多 ,两者费用无明显差别。结论 :输尿管镜治疗输尿管远端结石优于ESWL组
Objective: To investigate the efficacy of ESWL and ureter in the treatment of distal ureteral calculi. Methods: Through ESWL and ureteroscopy in the treatment of distal ureteral calculi stone row, the cure rate, the incidence of complications and comparative study of costs, summed up the advantages and disadvantages of the two methods. Results: There were 386 patients in ESWL group and 77% in stone clearance rate at 3 months after operation. There were fewer complications in ureteroscopy group, 46 0 patients in ureteroscopy group, and 93% net stones in 3 months. There were more complications, No significant difference in cost. Conclusions: Ureteroscopy is superior to ESWL in the treatment of distal ureteral stones