论文部分内容阅读
代表制度是现代宪法的关键要素之一。代表制度的编撰工作长期以来屡引争议,其推动政治秩序民主化的进程取决于诸多因素,包括宪法起草者所处的既有制度环境、关键政治主体间的权势格局、以及可获取的思想资源或政治文化。本文主要通过对泰国《2007年宪法》起草委员会(简称宪草委,CDC-Constitution Drafting Committee)多次会议记录的字斟句酌,深入探析其在议定泰国国会上议院(即参议院)构架方面所吸纳的思想缘起。为了提供宪法论争的相关背景,本文对1997年宪草委的各项工作进程做了更为简要的描述。最近的一项会议记录是在2013年11月,泰国宪法法院(the Constitutional Court)裁决已获泰国国会通过的宪法修正案无效,该修正案试图重新引入一个完全由民选产生的上议院。本文将此项研究与抵制“他信政权”的民众抗议活动形势深度相融。抗议活动始于2013年11月,一直在自称“人民民主改革委员会”(简称民革会,PDRC-People’s Democratic Reform)的组织领导之下。
The representation system is one of the key elements of the modern constitution. The process of making the democratization of the political order depends on a number of factors, including the existing institutional environment in which the drafters of the Constitution are located, the pattern of the power among the key political subjects, and the availability of ideological resources Or political culture. In this paper, I will analyze in depth the thoughts I have absorbed in the negotiation of the structure of the House of Representatives (Senate) in the Thai Parliament through the careful consideration of the minutes of the meetings of the Drafting Committee of the Constitution of Thailand in 2007 (referred to as the Constitutional Drafting Committee) origin. In order to provide a context for the constitutional debate, this article provides a more concise description of the work of the 1997 Constitutional Commission. A recent record of the meeting was that in November 2013, the Thai Constitutional Court ruled that the constitutional amendment passed by the Thai Parliament was invalidating the attempt to reintroduce a fully elected Lords House. This article integrates this study with the protest activities against boycott of “Thaksin regime.” The protests began in November 2013 and have been calling themselves “Organized by the People’s Democratic Reform Commission” (PDRC-People’s Democratic Reform).