最近看了一些关于鉴定工作的文章,参加了一些地方的鉴定工作,经常看到和听到“被包括了的文件”这个词,这些所谓“被包括了的文件”往往不被人重视,不看文件內容,只要被列入所谓“被包括了的文件”,保管期限就一律要从短,有的甚至认为根本可以不归档(见一九六四年《档案工作》第五期《应该解决不该归档而归档的问题》)。我认为这是一种只重形式不重內容,只看外表不研究实际的说法和做法。理由有二:第一,一切文件都可能包括别的文件,又可能被别的文件所包括。“被包括了的文件”的提法,本身是不完整的,由此来判定它的保管价值,更是不科学的。月份总结、季度总结固然是被年度总结包括了,但五年总结、十年总结又何尝不是包 Recently read some articles about the appraisal work, took part in appraisal work in some places, often saw and heard the word “included documents”, these so-called “included documents” are often not valued, and not As long as they are included in the so-called “documents that are included,” the period of their custody must be kept short, and some should even consider that they should not be archived at all (see “The Fifth Issue of Archives Work in 1964” should be resolved Should not be archived and archived “). I think this is a mere formality that does not matter, but looks at the exterior without studying actual statements and practices. There are two reasons for this: First, all documents may include other documents and may be covered by other documents. The reference to ”the included documents" is not complete in itself. It is even unscientific to judge its custody value. Summary of the month, although the quarterly summary is included in the annual summary, but five years summary, the conclusion is not a decade package