A meta-analysis of the effects of energy intake on risk of digestive cancers

来源 :World Journal of Gastroenterology | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:JSLDYY
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
AIM:To quantitatively assess the relationship between energy intake and the incidence of digestive cancers in a meta-analysis of cohort studies.METHODS:We searched MEDLINE,EMBASE,Science Citation Index Expanded,and the bibliographies of retrieved articles.Studies were included if they reported relative risks(RRs) and corresponding 95% CIs of digestive cancers with respect to total energy intake.When RRs were not available in the published article,they were computed from the exposure distributions.Data were extracted independently by two investigators and discrepancies were resolved by discussion with a third investigator.We performed fixed-effects meta-analyses and meta-regressions to compute the summary RR for highest versus lowest category of energy intake and for per unit energy intake and digestive cancer incidence by giving each study-specific RR a weight that was proportional to its precision.RESULTS:Nineteen studies consisting of 13 independent cohorts met the inclusion criteria.The studiesincluded 995 577 participants and 5620 incident cases of digestive cancer with an average follow-up of 11.1 years.A significant inverse association was observed between energy intake and the incidence of digestive cancers.The RR of digestive cancers for the highest compared to the lowest caloric intake category was 0.90(95% CI 0.81-0.98,P < 0.05).The RR for an increment of 239 kcal/d energy intake was 0.97(95% CI 0.95-0.99,P < 0.05) in the fixed model.In subgroup analyses,we noted that energy intake was associated with a reduced risk of colorectal cancer(RR 0.90,95% CI 0.81-0.99,P < 0.05) and an increased risk of gastric cancer(RR 1.19,95% CI 1.08-1.31,P < 0.01).There appeared to be no association with esophageal(RR 0.96,95% CI 0.86-1.07,P > 0.05) or pancreatic(RR 0.79,95% CI 0.49-1.09,P > 0.05) cancer.Associations were also similar in studies from North America and Europe.The RR was 1.02(95% CI 0.79-1.25,P > 0.05) when considering the six studies conducted in North America and 0.87(95% CI 0.77-0.98,P < 0.05) for the five studies from Europe.CONCLUSION:Our findings suggest that high energy intake may reduce the total digestive cancer incidence and has a preventive effect on colorectal cancer. AIM: To quantitatively assess the relationship between energy intake and the incidence of digestive cancers in a meta-analysis of cohort studies. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index Expanded, and the bibliographies of retrieved articles. reported relative risks (RRs) and corresponding 95% CIs of digestive cancers with respect to total energy intake. Who RRs were not available in the published article, they were computed from the exposure distributions.Data were extracted independently by two investigators and discrepancies were resolved by discussion with a third investigator. We performed fixed-effects meta-analyzes and meta-regressions to compute the summary RR for highest highest versus highest categories of energy intake and for per unit energy intake and digestive cancer incidence by giving each study-specific RR a weight that was proportional to its precision .RESULTS: Nineteen studies consisting of 13 independent cohorts with the inclusion criteria . The studies included 995 577 participants and 5620 incident cases of digestive cancer with an average follow-up of 11.1 years. A significant inverse association was observed between energy intake and the incidence of digestive cancers. The RR of digestive cancers for the highest compared to the The RR for an increment of 239 kcal / d energy intake was 0.97 (95% CI 0.95-0.99, P <0.05) in the fixed model. In subgroup analyzes, we noted that energy intake was associated with a reduced risk of colorectal cancer (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.81-0.99, P <0.05) and an increased risk of gastric cancer (RR 1.19, 95% CI 1.08-1.31 , P <0.01) .There was no association with esophageal (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.86-1.07, P> 0.05) or pancreatic (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.49-1.09, P> 0.05) also similar in studies from North America and Europe.The RR was 1.02 (95% CI 0.79-1.25, P> 0.05) when considering the six studies conducted in North Americaand 0.87 (95% CI 0.77-0.98, P <0.05) for the five studies from Europe. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that high energy intake may reduce the total digestive cancer incidence and has a preventive effect on colorectal cancer.
其他文献
简述了阵列被导光栅复用/解复用器件的基本原理及其相关特性,并对其在WDM光通信关键器件中的应用作了概述. The basic principle and related characteristics of ARQMD arrays
会议
本文首先整体阐述了国有企业会计管控体系的作用,并且进一步解析了国有企业会计管控体系的革新方案,以期为国有企业会计管理的高品质运作带来可参考的建议。
会议
本文对蒙古尔部族的组成、形成和发展作了介绍,其中对族长、土司的特点和承继作了详尽的描述。 This article introduces the composition, formation and development of t
安岳县城南乡竹林村二组,自1982年实行联产承包责任制以来,一直给果树施用沼肥。据对13750株果树三年的观察,证明有如下好处:一、不烂根。过去施用未经发酵处理的人畜粪有“
在鸦片战争前的1830年,天主教法国圣味增爵会就潜入察哈尔西湾子(今河北省崇礼县)设立了教堂,并开始向内蒙古各地扩展势力。1860年中法《北京条约》签订之后,法国忙于在京、
会议
1.补苗与定苗蓖麻常因干旱而缺苗,影响产量,必须及时补种.如果用催芽补种的方法,一定要提早进行,否则就起不到补苗增株的作用.晚补的苗往往赶不上早出苗壮实,形成二、三类苗
为了全面总结我国乔砧苹果密植栽培的经验与技术,使之进一步推广应用,继1981年渤海湾地区调查之后,我们于1984年7月至8月间对陕西、甘肃、青海三省及宁夏回族自治区进行考察