论文部分内容阅读
近些年来,由于语境的限制和习惯的惰性,在鲁迅研究以至整个人文与社会科学研究中,学术争鸣的气氛日渐淡薄,常常是各说各的话各唱各的调,相互间缺乏真诚坦率的评骘、交流与论争,貌似彰显个性又维持和谐气氛,实际上不利于学术质量的提升。因此,当看到《鲁迅研究月刊》2014年第10期发表的《鲁迅、施蛰存论争的态度与是非——兼与王福湘先生商榷》1(以下简称《商榷》)时,我感到欣慰。在反复研读之后,我不能同意
In recent years, due to the limitation of context and the inertia of custom, the academic contestation in the study of Lu Xun and even of the entire study of humanities and social sciences has become less and less frequent, and often the voices of all sisters are different in tone and lack of sincerity Commentaries, exchanges and controversies, seeming to highlight the personality and maintain a harmonious atmosphere, in fact, is not conducive to the improvement of academic quality. Therefore, I am gratified when I read the article, “Attitude and Falsity of Lu Xun and Shi Zhecun Disputes” published in the 10th issue of the “Research Monthly of the State of Lu Xun” (Discussion with Mr. Wang Fuxiang) 1 (hereinafter referred to as “deliberation”). After repeated studies, I can not agree