论文部分内容阅读
20世纪90年代以后,“学术”飙升,“思想”退位,演绎了一系列耐人寻味的现象。今天,作为历史转换时期的中国知识分子,我们对自己的学术活动究竟应当持怎样的认识,而我们常常引以为荣的现代学术史又有着怎样的特点呢?可以说,这是一个值得仔细辨析的重大问题,其意义不仅关乎我们学术传统的总结,更关乎中国知识分子的自我价值定位与中国现代文化的发展。王富仁先生最近完成了长达十二万字的论述《“新国学”论纲》,深入阐述了他对这一问题的系统思考。全文将由《社会科学战线》杂志于2005年连续刊出,为了让本出版物读者及时了解到其中的精辟思想,并参与由此引发的学术史反思,我们特别选择了其中的部分章节,以“中国现代学术文化的流变”为题在本刊推出。
After the 1990s, “academic” soared and “thought” abdicated, which deduced a series of intriguing phenomena. Today, as the Chinese intellectuals during the historical transition, what kind of understanding should we have of our own academic activities? What is the characteristic of the modern academic history which we often pride ourselves on? It can be said that it is worth to be careful The significance of discrimination is not only related to the conclusion of our academic tradition, but also to the self-localization of Chinese intellectuals and the development of modern Chinese culture. Mr. Wang Furen recently completed his 120,000-character essay “New Guoxue” and his “Outline of Studies”, elaborating on his systematic thinking on this issue. The full text will be published continuously by Social Science Frontier Magazine in 2005. In order to keep readers of this publication up-to-date and understand the scholarly thought and participate in the academic history reflection, we specially selected some of the chapters in order to “The Evolution of Chinese Modern Academic Culture” was launched in this issue.