论文部分内容阅读
孟子“以意逆志”是中国古典文学阐释史上具有深厚理论内涵的一个概念;伽达默尔“视野融合”理论有效地融合了读者和作者视域之间的界限与矛盾。这两种阐释理论都要求读者在解读文本时要注意与作者的创作意图相联系,关注它们在运行模式上的某种相似性。不同之处在于,前者侧重将作者之“志”作为最终的阐释目标,后者则注重将读者视野与作家视野进行融合。
Mencius’s “Inversion of Meaning” is a concept that has profound theoretical connotation in the interpretation history of classical Chinese literature; Gadamer’s “Fusion of Horizons” theory effectively blends the boundaries and contradictions between readers and authors. Both of these interpretive theories require that readers, in their interpretation of the text, pay attention to the author’s creative intention and pay attention to some similarity in their mode of operation. The difference is that the former focuses on the author’s “Chi ” as the ultimate goal of interpretation, the latter focuses on the reader’s vision and the writer’s vision integration.