《甲骨文合集补编》自出版以来,学者们在使用过程中逐步发现了其疏漏和不足,沈培、沈建华、蔡哲茂、谢济、王蕴智等先生都曾作文讨论过。经过具体阅读,可以发现仍然存在一些未为诸先生所发现的问题。鉴于此,兹选取第一、二册中的廿一例有关甲骨文例的问题与原释文进行商榷,以期得到对有关版片的更为准确完整的释读。 Since the publication of Oracle Inscription Supplement, scholars have discovered its omissions and deficiencies gradually. Shen Pei, Shen Jianhua, Cai Zhemao, Xie Ji, Wang Yunzhi and other gentlemen have discussed in composition. After a specific reading, you can see that there are still some problems that have not been discovered by the gentlemen. In view of this, I have taken the questions in the first and second volumes of the 21 examples concerning Oracle as the original explanatory texts, so as to obtain a more accurate and complete interpretation of the relevant editions.