论文部分内容阅读
米兰达规则开世界先河赋予了犯罪嫌疑人沉默权,赋予犯罪嫌疑人沉默权已成为多数国家的做法,但米兰达规则确立的沉默权是否符合多数国家的实际情况则存在较大疑问。证伪方法是检验理论真伪与否的利器,可以采用证伪方法从理论和实例两重角度对沉默权正当问题进行分析,进而得出没有沉默权,犯罪嫌疑人的人权保障不会毫无章程可言;不赋予犯罪嫌疑人以沉默权制度,当事人完全可以对抗公权力以保护自己的应有权利。因此,我国新《刑事诉讼法》未规定犯罪嫌疑人享有沉默权并无不当。
The Miranda rules have given the world the best in the world, and giving the suspects the right to silence has become a common practice in most countries. However, whether Miranda’s right to silence is in line with the actual conditions in most countries is a matter of great doubt. Falsification method is to test the authenticity of the weapon or not, you can use the fake method from both the theoretical and practical point of view right to silence the issue of analysis, and then concluded that there is no right to silence, the suspect’s human rights protection will not be without At the same time, the Constitution can not be said. Without giving the suspect the right to silence, the parties can completely defend their rights to protect their own rights. Therefore, China’s new “Code of Criminal Procedure” does not provide for the suspect to enjoy the right to silence is not inappropriate.