在复建的明太原城工程见于报道后,有许多人不以为然,认为“复建”的古迹不过是假文物,复建的目的也不在于古迹保护本身,而只是为了开发旅游之类的商业目的。此外,省下这笔钱用于改善民生,岂不更好?大部分人之所以反对复建乃至必要的修复,与其说是“古迹修复/复建得怎么样”这样一个学术问题,而是“古城该不该修复/复建”这样一个政治问题,也就是说,即便复原得再好,他们也会不以为然,因为“复原”本身 After the restoration of the Ming Taiyuan Urban Project was reported, many people disagreed that the “restoration” monuments were nothing more than fake artifacts. The purpose of reconstruction was not to protect the monuments themselves, but to develop tourism and the like Commercial purpose. In addition, saving the money to improve people’s livelihood, would not it be better? Most people object to the restoration and even the necessary repair, rather than “how the restoration of ancient monuments / rehabilitation” such an academic issue, But rather a political issue such as “should not the ancient city be rehabilitated / rebuilt”, that is to say, they will disagree even if the rehabilitating is better, because “rehabilitating” itself