论文部分内容阅读
目的观察比较腹腔镜与开腹行异位妊娠手术的临床疗效。方法将30例异位妊娠患者,随机分为观察组和对照组各15例。观察组采取腹腔镜手术,对照组采取开腹手术,比较2组患者手术情况及术后恢复情况。结果观察组在手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间、术后下床活动时间、肛门排气时间以及腹痛消失时间方面,均明显优于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论腹腔镜手术需要由专业医师进行操作,与开腹手术相比较,在功能保留以及微创方面,腹腔镜手术有着较大的优势。
Objective To compare the clinical effects of laparoscopic and open abdominal ectopic pregnancy. Methods 30 cases of ectopic pregnancy were randomly divided into observation group and control group, 15 cases each. The observation group was treated by laparoscopy and the control group by laparotomy. The operation and postoperative recovery of the two groups were compared. Results The observation group was significantly better than the control group in terms of operation time, intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, postoperative ambulation time, anal exhaust time and abdominal pain disappearance time, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05) . Conclusions Laparoscopic surgery requires the intervention of a professional physician. Compared with open surgery, laparoscopic surgery has great advantages in functional preservation and minimally invasive surgery.