首先我要对上原一庆教授和高桥伸夫教授在第52号的《近邻》(发表于2007年11月)上为我们的著作写作书评表示衷心的感谢。在一系列书评发表之后,执笔者们于2007年12月8日召开了一个讨论会,我的这篇回应是在这个背景下完成的。请允许我以下把两位的书评简称为“上原书评”和“高桥书评”。1在几篇书评中,评者们关注的第一个问题是连续与非连续的问题,因为本书所要阐述的主要问题正是这一点。上原书评和高桥书评告诉我们,因为1949年的革命造成了一个巨大的断层,出现了一些失去连续性的领域,但是同时依然存在着具有连续性的领域。比如说,相对政治领 First of all, I’d like to express my heart-felt thanks to Professor Uehara Yasuhiro and Professor Takahashi Takahashi for writing a book review of our work in Neighbor No. 52 (November 2007). After a series of book reviews were published, the writers held a seminar on December 8, 2007, and my response was completed in this context. Please allow me to refer to the two book reviews below as “Uehara Book Review” and “Takahashi Book Review.” 1 In several book reviews, the first question that critics focus on is the question of continuity and discontinuity, as this is exactly the main question that is addressed in this book. The Book Review of the Uighur and Takahashi Book Reviews tell us that because the revolution in 1949 created a huge fault and some areas of loss of continuity emerged, there were still areas of continuity at the same time. For example, relative political collar