论文部分内容阅读
目的:评估临床病房护士对于为患者做好核医学检查前准备和检查过程中解释所需的核医学相关知识的了解状况。方法:通过在线问卷调查的方式，向南京医科大学附属无锡第二医院11个经常进行核医学检查的临床病房中的护士发放问卷。问卷由3部分组成：一般性资料、主观性评价和客观知识测试，调查参与者的职称、学历、工作年限、对为患者做好核医学检查前准备和检查中解释所需的核医学相关知识的自我评价及客观知识测试(27个单项选择题)等情况。采用单因素方差分析和两独立样本n t检验比较不同职称、学历及自我评价者间的客观知识测试题目回答正确情况的差异；另行Pearson相关分析探讨客观测试成绩与工作年限间的相关性。n 结果:问卷有效回收率为96.4%(267/277)。96.3%(257/267)的参与者表示没有接受过核医学相关培训，4.9%(13/267)的参与者认为自己了解核医学。50.2%(134/267)参与者认为能为患者进行核医学检查做好准备工作；49.8%(133/267)认为能为患者提供核医学检查的解释工作。客观知识测试每人回答正确题目(14.6±2.8)个，总正确率为(54.9±10.5)%。初级、中级和高级职称者分别回答正确题目(14.1±2.8)、(15.5±2.3)和(16.8±3.9)个(n F＝9.789, n P<0.001)；本科及以上学历与专科学历者分别回答正确题目(15.8±2.5)和(14.2±2.8)个(n t＝3.477，n P<0.001)。客观知识测试回答正确情况与工作年限间有一定的相关性(n r＝0.257，n P<0.01)。病房护士获得核医学信息的最主要方式是通过同事介绍(57.7%，154/267)或科室教育(18.0%，48/267)等体验式教学获得。n 结论:临床病房护士普遍缺乏正式的核医学教育和培训，其对核医学检查的认识不足。应考虑工作特点和学习模式，为病房护士及其他病房工作人员提供核医学诊疗的相关信息。“,”Objective:To evaluate ward nurses′ understanding of nuclear medicine and assess whether they can prepare for scintigraphy procedures and answer patient′s questions about nuclear medicine examinations.Methods:An online questionnaire was provided to nurses in 11 wards of Wuxi Second Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University where nuclear medicine examinations were frequently undergone. The questionnaire contained 3 parts: general data, self-assessment, objective testing of knowledge about nuclear medicine. Professional titles, educations, working years, self-assessment and objective testing for knowledge of nuclear medicine for patients′ preparation and question of involvers were collected. Results of objective knowledge test among different professional titles, educations and the results of self-assessment were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and independent-sample n t test. Pearson correlation analysis was used to evaluate the correlation between objective testing results and working years.n Results:The effective receiving rate of questionnaire was 96.4%(267/277). There were 96.3%(257/267) involvers did not receive any specific training in nuclear medicine, and only 4.9%(13/267) considered they knew nuclear medicine well. There were 50.2%(134/267) involvers thought that their knowledge of nuclear medicine was enough to prepare nuclear medicine examination for patients and 49.8%(133/267) involvers thought that they were able to explain nuclear medicine examination for patients. In objective knowledge test, (14.6±2.8) questions answered correctly for each person, with a correct rate of (54.9±10.5)%. There were (14.1±2.8), (15.5±2.3) and (16.8±3.9) questions answered correctly in involvers with primary title, mid-level title and senior title respectively (n F=9.789, n P<0.001), and (15.8±2.5), (14.2±2.8) in involvers with bachelor degree or above and college degree (n t=3.477, n P<0.001). There was only subtle correlation between objective testing results and working years (n r=0.257, n P<0.01). The main way that involvers obtained nuclear information was through experience-based teaching methods such as introductions from colleagues(57.7%, 154/267) and department education(18.0%, 48/267).n Conclusions:Lacking of formal nuclear medicine orientation is common in ward nurses, and their understanding of nuclear medicine examinations is insufficient. Working characteristics and learning patterns of ward nurses should be considered when providing information on nuclear medicine treatments for them.