史学研究的碎片化与总体史

来源 :华中师范大学研究生学报 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:LIZHAOAA
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
自司马迁以降,“究天人之际,通古今之变”即成为中国史学的优良传统。事实上,西方史学也有着同样的传统。不仅如此,18世纪启蒙运动后这一传统还得以“发扬光大”。在科学革命的鼓舞和刺激下,史学界对自身使命有了新认知,即注重对人类历史命运和规律的探寻和总结。在他们看来,人类社会的演进如同自然界存在万有引力一样,也存在着客观规律。嗣后两百年的时间里,史学 Since the fall of Sima Qian, “study of the occasion of heaven and earth, through ancient and modern changes ” that is, the fine tradition of Chinese historiography. In fact, Western historians also share the same tradition. Not only this, the tradition of the 18th century after the Enlightenment has also been able to “carry forward.” Inspired and stimulated by the scientific revolution, historians have gained a new understanding of their mission, that is, they pay attention to the exploration and conclusion of the fate and laws of human history. In their view, the evolution of human society is the same as the gravitation in nature. There are also objective laws. Two hundred years later, history
其他文献