论文部分内容阅读
两高的司法解释虽明确了恶意透支型信用卡诈骗罪的构成要件,但司法实践中对催收要件的理解和非法占有目的的认定仍存在诸多争议。且随着信用卡诈骗犯罪手段及类型的多样化,单位实施恶意透支行为的认定及处理也日益棘手。因此,需要对恶意透支型信用卡诈骗罪的各构成要件及新的犯罪形式认定进行重新思考。
Although the two high-level judicial interpretations make up the elements of the crime of malicious overdraft credit card fraud, there are still many controversies in judicial practice regarding the understanding of the objections and the purpose of illegal possession. And with the diversification of criminal means and types of credit card fraud, the unit to identify and deal with malicious overdraft is also increasingly tricky. Therefore, it is necessary to reconsider the constitutional elements of the crime of malicious overdraft credit card fraud and the identification of new criminal patterns.