腾讯诉奇虎不正当竞争纠纷案作为互联网的“公地悲剧”事件,暗示了依据网络服务提供者的特点创新发展其规制模式十分必要。对网络服务提供者的规制主要涉及政府、行业协会、社会公众三类主体。现行的以政府为绝对主导、其他主体予以配合的自上而下的规制模式已产生了一系列问题,包括缺乏多方利害关系人的沟通协商、制定法本身存在缺陷、行业协会无法发挥作用、社会公众参与不足等。基于“多中心治理”等理论,应构建以平等信任、开放兼容、多向互动为特点的多中心协同规制网络服务提供者模式:政府放权给社会自组织进行公私协作;行业协会通过参与规制以发展个体需求并承担社会责任;拓宽社会公众的参与渠道,利用制度性安排与网络服务平台达到信息公开互通。 Tencent v. Qihoo unfair competition disputes as the Internet “commons tragedy ” incident, suggesting that according to the characteristics of network service providers innovation and development of its regulatory model is necessary. The regulation of network service providers mainly involves the government, industry associations, the public three main categories. The current top-down regulatory model that is absolutely dominated by the government and co-ordinated by other actors has created a series of problems, including the lack of communication and negotiation among various stakeholders, the flaws in the statute itself, the inability of trade associations to make any difference, the social Lack of public participation and so on. Based on the theory of multi-center governance, multi-center synergetic network service providers characterized by equal trust, openness and compatibility and multi-directional interaction should be built: the government decentralizes public-private collaboration to social self-organizations; Regulate the development of individual needs and assume social responsibilities; broaden the channels of public participation, the use of institutional arrangements and network services platform to achieve open information exchange.