论文部分内容阅读
在最近三四十年里,欧洲历史学家的生活世界发生了显著的变化:他们身处其中的民族国家彼此之间已逐渐实现政治、经济乃至其他领域的紧密合作或联合,正步入“一体化”时代,诸如“欧盟”一类的跨民族国家或“超民族国家”实体,便是其集中的表达。对于历史学家来说,这种新的体验除了存在于周遭的日常交往世界,还同样存在于自身思维的世界里,其中的新体验,便是他们在新的、具有跨民族国家氛围的时代境遇里,对某一特定民族国家的过去所展开的历史书写。那么,相较于既往的相关书写,它有何推陈出新之处呢?笔者此处所要集中评价的《中世纪中期的意大利(1000-1300)》,①便以其富于代表性意义的书写实践,予我们一个窥得其意的入口。
In the recent three or four decades, the living world of European historians has undergone a remarkable change: the nation-states in which they live have gradually come to close cooperation or joint political, economic and other fields with each other and are moving into the In the era of “integration”, such as the “EU” category of inter-ethnic countries or “super-national” entities, is its concentration of expression. For historians, this new experience, besides existing in the world of daily interaction, also exists in the world of self-thinking, and the new experience among them is that they are in a new age with cross-nation atmosphere Situation, the past history of a particular nation-state history written. So, what’s new about the related writing? The “Mid-Medieval Italy (1000-1300)” which the author wants to focus on here, 1 is based on his representative writing practice, Give us a glimpse of the entrance.