论文部分内容阅读
目的对比分析自凝刀(BBT)及疮疡灵膏治疗宫颈糜烂的疗效。方法2005年4月~2006年6月对180例患者分别按宫颈糜烂的程度与类型分三组,每组随机分为自凝刀治疗组及药物治疗组。前者使用自凝刀治疗宫颈糜烂,后者直接使用疮疡灵膏1号,2个月后复查,观察糜烂面愈合情况。结果两种方法治疗单纯、颗粒型及轻中度宫颈糜烂,疗效差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。对于乳突型及重度宫颈糜烂,自凝刀法优于疮疡灵治疗法,疗效差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论自凝刀治疗单纯型、颗粒型及轻中度宫颈糜烂与疮疡灵膏疗效相同,对于乳突型或重度宫颈糜烂自凝刀治疗明显占有优势。
Objective To compare and analyze the curative effect of self-coagulation knife (BBT) and sore ulcer cream on cervical erosion. Methods From April 2005 to June 2006, 180 patients were divided into three groups according to the degree and type of cervical erosion. Each group was randomly divided into self-coagulation therapy group and drug treatment group. The former self-coagulation knife treatment of cervical erosion, the latter direct use of sore ulcer Ling No. 1, 2 months after the review, observe the erosion surface healing. Results The two methods of treatment of simple, granular and mild to moderate cervical erosion, the difference was not statistically significant (P> 0.05). For papillary type and severe cervical erosion, self-coagulation knife method is superior to sore ulcer treatment, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion Self-coagulation knife treatment of simple type, granular and mild to moderate cervical erosion with the same effect of sore and ulcer, for mastoid or severe cervical erosion self-coagulation knife treatment has obvious advantages.