一、概述在市场交易的过程中,当出现了第三方主体主动介入他人业已成立或者即将成立的合同,破坏了在先债权的产生或实现的情况时,并非是一概地不加区别的要求该第三人承担侵权责任的。因为首先,在私法领域,毕竟自治仍然是其产生作用的重要手段,若不加区分的进行“一刀切”式的限制,行为人碍于对法律的畏惧,其行为必然会受到限制从而影响市场活力。与此同时,我们应当认识到,私法自治也并非无远弗届,法律不会放 I. Overview In the course of market transactions, when a third-party principal voluntarily intervenes in a contract that another person has already established or is about to establish, destroying the generation or realization of the prior claim, it is not an indiscriminate request The third person to bear tort liability. First of all, in the field of private law, after all, autonomy is still an important means of its function. If there is indiscriminate “one-size-fits-all” restriction, the perpetrator will inevitably be limited by its fear of the law Market vitality. At the same time, we should realize that the autonomy of private law is not unlimited and laws do not