论文部分内容阅读
一 文史哲不分家,是中国学术的优良传统。钱穆先生就认为:“中国人好求通,为学亦然”。“欲深通中国之文学,又必先通诸子百家”。(《现代中国学术论衡》第231、230页)这一传统一直到“五四”那一代巨匠都未曾断过。但后来,由于种种原因(既有历史的原因,如:院系调整,也有时代思潮影响的原因,如:思路狭窄),文史哲分家了。不仅文史哲之间分了家,各家门内也越分越细。单看文学,即有古代文学、近代文学、现代文学、当代文学、外国文学、文学理论之分,在这
A historical and philosophical division is an excellent tradition of Chinese academic. Mr. Qian Mu thinks: “Chinese people are seeking good things and they learn for the same reason.” “To thoroughly understand the Chinese literature, we must first make all our means.” (“Modern Chinese Academic Equilibrium” pp. 231, 230) This tradition did not break until the May 4th generation. However, later, due to various reasons (both historical reasons, such as: departmental adjustment, but also the reasons for the impact of the trend of thought, such as: narrow thinking), literature, history and philosophy. Not only the separation of literary, historical and philosophical home, each door is also more subtle. Just look at literature, that ancient literature, modern literature, modern literature, contemporary literature, foreign literature, literary theory of the points in this