论文部分内容阅读
据《自然》杂志报道,帕格沃希科学和世界事务会议的德国分部最近批评了德国研究联合会(DFG)的一份报告,该报告提出应放松对德国科学家的业务工作特别是生物技术方面的严格法规管理。 德国科学家联合会(VDW)在今夏初表表了一份激烈的报告,声称DFG的报告是“伪善和自怜的”。VDW声称,研究的真正威胁并不是管理过严,而是对于“满足短期经济或医疗需求压力”的日益增大的响应趋势。 VDW是1959年由反对核装备的原子物理学家建立的,其中包括麦克思·玻恩、奥托·哈恩、维纳尔·海森堡和马克思·冯·劳厄等人。 VDW称DFG的报告显示出从事研究的科学家对公众所关注的问题——如在实验和遗传工程中使用动物的问题——缺乏了解。它声称“研究是由社会支付的,因而应对社会负责”。 在两篇涉及德国宪法的基本权利——它在用于人类胚胎研究问题时出现了矛盾——的文章中表现出强烈的分歧:
The German section of the Pugwash Conference on Science and World Affairs recently criticized a report by the German Research Consortium (DFG), which reportedly deregulated the work of German scientists, in particular biotechnology Strict regulatory aspects of the management. The German Federation of Scientists (VDW) presented a fierce report earlier this summer claiming that DFG’s report is “hypocrisy and self-pity.” VDW claims that the real threat to research is not over-management, but rather a growing response to the “pressure to meet the short-term economic or medical needs.” The VDW was founded in 1959 by atomic physicists who oppose nuclear equipment, including Max Born, Otto Hahn, Wiener Heisenberg and Marx von Loeuser. The VDG said DFG’s report shows that scientists engaged in research lacked public understanding of issues of public concern, such as the use of animals in experimental and genetic engineering. It asserts that “research is paid by the community and therefore responsible to society.” In two articles that deal with the fundamental rights of the German constitution, which emerged contradictory when used in the research of human embryos, there is a strong disagreement: