论文部分内容阅读
在传统司法观念中,起诉法定主义长期占据统治地位,不论犯罪性质、犯罪情节和具体犯罪嫌疑人的特点,刑事案件只能通过公诉方式结案。这不仅忽略了被害人的利益,而且导致了司法成本的不断上升。如何在刑事司法体系中实现既保护被害人利益、恢复被破坏的社会关系,又达到加害人改过自新、回归社会的目标,是当今各国刑事司法政策面临的一个现实难题。然而,在刑事和解适用过程中,由于执法者滥用自由裁量权和对加害人与被害人救济机制的不完善,导致刑事和解在执行中出现偏差。
In the traditional concept of justice, prosecution of legal doctrine has long dominated, regardless of the nature of the crime, the crime and the specific characteristics of criminal suspects, criminal cases can only be closed by public prosecution. This not only ignored the interests of the victims, but also led to the rising judicial costs. How to realize the goal of protecting the interests of victims and restoring vandalism in the criminal justice system and achieving the goals of perpetrators turning themselves over again and returning to society is a realistic problem that criminal jurisdictions in various countries nowadays face. However, during the process of the application of criminal reconciliation, due to the abuse of discretion by law enforcement officials and the imperfect relief mechanism for the perpetrators and victims, the criminal reconciliation has deviated from its implementation.