本文认为,一定方法在实践过程中的运用,也就直接体现着一定的人类主体性理念、能力与水平,马克思主义哲学方法论,体现着人类主体性的最高境界。马克思主义哲学方法论是马克思主义及其哲学理论的生命线,它最能实现马克思主义理论所独有的实践意向,它是马克思主义理论与社会实践直接对接的重要桥梁。在当代中国深化改革的历史进程中,在中华民族为实现“中国梦”的伟大征途中,马克思主义的方法论及其马克思主义哲学的方法论具有丰富而重大的意义。本文先对哲学方法作了一般的概述,明确了方法的一般概念、方法的一般属性、方法的一般来源的三种途径,讨论了哲学史研究的方法对于哲学方法论的重要意义,分析了领导方法、管理方法与哲学方法的密切关系。然后,本文对马克思主义哲学方法论作了概述,界定了马克思主义哲学方法论的性质和学科地位及其在马克思主义哲学的理论体系中逻辑地位和实践功能,提出了“马克思主义哲学方法论”的框架,并对其中的“社会实践方法”、“矛盾分析方法”和“哲学方法论与策略研究的关系”作了一些富有新意的探讨。 This paper argues that the application of a certain method in the practice process directly embodies certain concepts, capabilities and levels of human subjectivity and the methodology of Marxist philosophy, which embodies the highest level of human subjectivity. The methodology of Marxist philosophy is the lifeline of Marxism and its philosophical theory. It can most effectively implement the practical intention of Marxist theory. It is an important bridge linking Marxist theory directly with social practice. In the historical process of deepening the reform in contemporary China, the methodology of Marxism and its methodology in Marxist philosophy have great and great significance in the great journey of the Chinese nation in realizing “China’s dream.” This article first generalizes the philosophical methods, clarifies the general concepts of the methods, the general properties of the methods and the general sources of the methods. It discusses the significance of the philosophical history research methods for philosophical methodology and analyzes the methods of leadership , Management methods and philosophy of the close relationship. Then, this article gives an overview of the methodology of Marxist philosophy, defines the nature and subject status of Marxist philosophy methodology and its logical position and practical function in the theoretical system of Marxist philosophy, puts forward “Marxist Philosophy Methodology” It also makes a number of innovative discussions on the relationship between “social practice methods”, “contradictions analysis methods” and “the relationship between philosophical methodology and tactical research”.