论文部分内容阅读
近几年,司法上的地方保护主义愈演愈烈,它既影响了法律对当事人合法权益的保护,损害了司法机关的公正形象,同时又直接威胁到了国家法制的统一,它已成为司法界的一大公害。正是从消除并预防这一公害出发,法学界有人提出了赋予民事诉讼当事人管辖异议权并进而建立管辖异议之诉的设想,司法机关并以司法解释的形式明确确认了当事人的异议权和异议之诉。考虑到目前的现状和面临的问题,提出这样一种设想并采取这样一种做法,是可以理解的;它也能在一事一时中起点积极作用。但是,这样一种设想和做法是否具有理论基础和法律依据;尤其是,它是否能遏制住地方保护主义的蔓廷,倒是值得研究的。
In recent years, judicial protectionism has intensified. It not only affects the protection of the lawful rights and interests of the parties, but also jeopardizes the just image of the judiciary. At the same time it directly threatens the unity of the state legal system. It has become a major area of the judiciary Pollution. It is from the elimination and prevention of this public nuisance. Some scholars in jurisprudence put forward the idea of giving civil litigants jurisdiction over objections and further establishing a lawsuit of opposition to objections. Judicial authorities have clearly identified the parties’ right of dissent and opposition in the form of judicial interpretation The complaint. Given the current situation and the problems it faces, it is understandable to propose such a concept and take such a course; it can also play a positive role in the event. However, whether such a concept or practice has a theoretical foundation or a legal basis and whether it can curb the spread of local protectionism is worthy of study.